PACER Class Action Lawsuit – National Veterans Legal Services Program et al v United States

PACER Class Action Lawsuit – National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. v. United States
EventHorizon1984
17 May 2017

 

“Paying too much for PACER? You could get an email notice later this spring to join a class action”
Amanda Bronstad
In PACER Suit, a Class Action Even Defense Lawyers Can Love

 

Need quick online access to Federal Court records? Then you want PACER (pacer.gov).

What is PACER?

“Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) is an electronic public access service that allows users to obtain case and docket information online from federal appellate, district, and bankruptcy courts, and the PACER Case Locator. PACER is provided by the Federal Judiciary in keeping with its commitment to providing public access to court information via a centralized service.”

“The Federal Judiciary has developed a Next Generation (NextGen) Case Management/ Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system that will allow you to use the same account for both PACER and electronic filing access”

“The PACER Case Locator is a national index for U.S. district, bankruptcy, and appellate courts. A subset of information from each case is transferred to the PACER Case Locator server each night”

“PACER is available to anyone who registers for an account.

The more than one million PACER users include attorneys, pro se filers, government agencies, trustees, data collectors, researchers, educational and financial institutions, commercial enterprises, the media, and the general public.”

PACER registration is free, but there is a fee for document access.

“All registered agencies or individuals are charged a user fee of $0.10 per page. This charge applies to the number of pages that results from any search, including a search that yields no matches (one page for no matches).”

“The schedule places a cap on the per-page charge, with a maximum $3, the equivalent of 30 pages, for electronic access to any single document. For example, a 50 page document that would cost $5 at $0.10 a page is capped at 30 pages and only costs $3. Users will receive the entire 50-page document but are only charged $3. Each attachment in CM/ECF sites is considered a separate document. Therefore, the cap will apply to each attachment over 30 pages separately.”

“The PACER Service Center bills quarterly and sends a statement by mail or email. Fees are waived when usage is less than $15 for the quarter.”

Why the fees for public documents?

In 1988, the Judiciary sought appropriations from the U.S. Congress in order to provide electronic public access to court records. However, Congress did not provide the funds and instead directed the Judiciary to fund the initiative through user fees. As a result, the program relies exclusively on fee revenue.

Are these fees reasonable? On 21 April 2016, the National Veterans Legal Services Program, National Consumer Law Center, and the Alliance For Justice presented the case “that PACER’s fee schedule is higher than necessary to cover the costs of operating PACER.”

A few months later, on 24 January 2017, “U.S. District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle in the District of Columbia approved the” ‘class action lawsuit.’

The nineteen (19) page document ends with:

CONCLUSION

Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is granted, with minor modifications to the proposed class definition. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ Ellen Segal Huvelle
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE
United States District Judge

Date: January 24, 2017

 

Of course, notice of this event reached our email box on 16 May 2017.

 

  Gmail - PACER Fees - Notice of Class Action Lawsuit 70

 

Of course, settlement talks began in March. And according to a 11 March 2017 article, all parties were “to report back to the court no later than April 21.

Did we mention it’s May?

/*
“One of those hobbies of mine, is studying laws. The laws you used to be paid to enforce.”
Detective Robert Goren

cookie
//

EverQuest II – Tell Us What You Think!

EverQuest II – Tell Us What You Think!
EventHorizon1984
6 March 2017

 

“Essentially, it’s another timesink for end-game players”
Philip Kollar
Touring the living remains of an 11-year-old MMO

 

Surveys regarding EverQuest II are few. The last time any here received an EverQuest II survey, the previous owner got hacked.

Years later, here’s what showed up in the Gmail box.

 

Tell Us What You Think

The survey is short.

EQ2 Survey 1
All properties of Daybreak Game Company have been suffering outages, since 2 January 2017.

Daybreak Games 20170102

Meaning question number five should have been a no-brainer, for management.

EQ2 Survey 2

Is San Diego based Daybreak Game Company really looking to improve customer service? Is this merely a method to placate the dwindling user base?

Or is the owner of Daybreak Game Company, Columbus Nova, looking for an excuse to offload the EverQuest franchise?

Time will tell.

/*
EverQuest co-creator John Smedley is leading a new San Diego-based studio for Amazon Game Studios
15 February 2017

cookie
//


May 2017
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

Categories

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.